Legal Opinion

Duvall v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 16, 2003No. 39, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The issue presented for resolution by this case is whether a tort judgment may be satisfied by invading the principal of a spendthrift trust held for the benefit of the tortfeasor. The Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, recognizing that Maryland law only allows invasion of a spendthrift trust by a narrow class of creditors, and, only in limited circumstances, declined to expand the class or the circumstances. It opined that to hold that tort judgment creditors are among the class of creditors that have traditionally been allowed to invade a spendthrift trust in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Zouck v. ZouckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Smith v. TowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  4. Price v. HitafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Curran v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Young v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Duvall v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API