Legal Opinion

H. J. McMullen & Co. v. Hammann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1931No. 991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

Appellee Henry I-Iammann, on September 14, 1929, instituted this suit against Arthur E. Smith and wife, Myrtle Mae Smith, to recover the balance due on a promissory note dated July 17, 1919, in the principal sum of $2,200, with interest from date at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum and for 10 per cent, additional on the amount due as attorney’s fees. Said note was by its terms payable in monthly installments of $15 each, together with all interest accrued on the principal sum to such date; the first of said installments being due August 10, 1919, and one each month thereafter. Said note…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Oriental Hotel Company v. GriffithsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Moore Son v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of Fort Worth v. SheroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Citizens' National Bank v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crumley v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Novosad v. SvrcekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. McMurrey v. LampkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Henderson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Fakes v. VilvenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API