Minor v. Minor

ANDERSON, O. J.

The decree that was amended was either self-correcting or showed upon its face such a conflict as to indicate a clerical error in including therein the words “during the pendency of this suit,” which said words were, in effect, contradictory of the decree which was intended to award permanent alimony or support. The final decree had previously settled the question of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees, and then dealt witfi and fixed the permanent allowance of $35 a month to be paid “on the 10th of each month hereafter.” The decree also taxed the cost and was to all intent a…