Matter of Desmond
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Appellant was committed to Faribault State Hospital as a mentally retarded person in April, 1985. A review hearing was held on October 31, 1985. Counsel for appellant sought a specific period for continued commitment, arguing indeterminate commitment is unconstitutional. In the alternative, appellant sought appointment of a guardian ad litem. The motions were denied on November 19 and commitment for an indeterminate period was ordered on November 20. Appellant seeks review of both orders, and the attorney general intervened to defend the constitutionality of Minn.Stat.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re HeflerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of HarhutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of FredericksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of HarhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In re DesmondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986