Legal Opinion

McClure v. Biesenbach

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 2009No. 08-50854UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Before the court are claims of municipal liability and procedural due process viola tions. Plaintiffs Patrick McClure and his company, Maximum’ Entertainment LLC, sued Defendants William Biesenbach, Rudy Davilla 1 , and the City of San Antonio under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After construing the first amended complaint, the district court dismissed the municipal liability claim against San Antonio pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court then entered summary judgment on the procedural due process claim in favor of Biesenbach and Davilla. Extant claims were…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duffie v. Wichita CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Lefebure v. BoekerDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. Causer v. ArdDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
  4. Ferdinand v. St. James ParishDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
  5. Higginbotham v. City of LouisvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API