Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Holdrege

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1898No. 8080PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 55 Neb. 173.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This ease is now before us on rehearing. In the former opinion (55 Neb. 173) i,t ivas held that the transfer of the fund and property here in controversy, by O. W. Mosher *380to the Western Manufacturing Company, was made in fraud of Mosher’s creditors. To that conclusion we still adhere. The transfer being fraudulent as to creditors was void as to them, but only to the extent that it was prejudicial to their rights. Between the parties the assignment was valid and effective. (Baldwin v. Burt, 43 Neb. 245; Richardson v. Welch, 47 Mich. 309; Freeman v. Auld, 44 N. Y. 50; Songer v. Partridge, 107…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Commercial National Bank v. BurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Warner v. WhittakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Willis v. TwamblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  5. Baldwin v. BurtNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Reid v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dawson County State Bank v. DurlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Glissmann v. BauermeisterNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Coon v. O'BrienNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API