Legal Opinion

Reid v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. In Banc. William Reid, plaintiff and respondent, instituted in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon in and for Multnomah County a suit to enjoin T. M. Hurlburt, Sheriff of Multnomah County, from collecting the sum of $2,197.53, or any sum over and above $781.65, as taxes due Multnomah County from him, as administrator of the estate of David C. Pelton, deceased.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. In Banc. William Reid, plaintiff and respondent, instituted in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon in and for Multnomah County a suit to enjoin T. M. Hurlburt, Sheriff of Multnomah County, from collecting the sum of $2,197.53, or any sum over and above $781.65, as taxes due Multnomah County from him, as administrator of the estate of David C. Pelton, deceased. The suit also had for its purpose the restraining of the defendant from enforcing said tax against the administrator personally, and the removal of a cloud upon the title to Lots 1 and 2 in…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

1, 2. When the pertinent facts in this case are analyzed in the light of the statute relating to assessment and taxation, all intricate questions disappear. Were the promissory notes made and delivered by William Beid, plaintiff, to deceased in his lifetime, what they appeared to be? In other words, were these three certain promissory notes at the time of their assessment the written evidence of an indebt- ’ edness of $100,000 due and owing from Beid to the Pelton estate? We believe that both these inquiries should be answered in the affirmative. Assuming that these notes were what the law…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Union Stock Yards & Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ashe-Carson Co. v. BonifaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Baird v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Allstead v. LaumeisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Harton v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. West Los Angeles Institute for Cancer Research v. Ward MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Taylor v. GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Merit v. LoseyOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hinkle v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API