Legal Opinion

Farmers' Mutual Insurance v. Young

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1937No. 15,682PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlME, J.

To the amended complaint herein in one paragraph (to which was attached a copy of the policy therein sued on as an exhibit) wherein the appellees, Young and Young, sought recovery against the appellant for loss sustained by fire to the property covered by said policy, the appellant filed a general denial and a second paragraph of amended answer. The appellees Young and Young demurred to this second paragraph of amended answer on the ground that it did not constitute a defense to the complaint. This demurrer was sustained, whereupon the appellant withdrew its answer in general denial, refused…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. JacobySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Harvey v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Gould v. Maine Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. Kedzie v. Town of EwingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emmco Insurance Co. v. Indiana Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Emmco Insurance Co. v. Indiana Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API