Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lanford

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1993No. 92CA1362PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Defendant, Fred Lanford, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion as untimely pursuant to § 16-5-402, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A). We vacate the order and remand with directions.

In 1982, defendant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery of drugs. During the advisement, the defendant was informed that his sentence could be as long as 24 years if aggravating circumstances were found. However, defendant was not advised that, pursuant to § 17-22.5-303(1), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A), he was also subject to a mandatory parole term of one year.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. White v. Denver District Court, Division 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. People v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. McPhersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. Xue XiongColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. BonanColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People v. PadillaColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API