Feeney v. Com. of Mass.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TAURO, District Judge.
By order of remand from the Supreme Court, we have been instructed to reconsider our decision in Anthony v. Commonwealth,1 415 F.Supp. 485 (D.Mass.1976), in light of the Court’s subsequent decision in Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 96 S.Ct. 2040, 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976).2 After further briefing and oral argument, we conclude that Davis does not require us to alter our original holding. To the contrary, we have determined that both Davis and the Court’s later opinion in Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Larry P. v. RilesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Harris v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Organization for Women, New York Chapter v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.