People v. Miller

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidencé and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports a reasonable inference that defendant intended to sell the drugs he possessed (see e.g. People v Daley, 281 AD2d 244 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 827 [2001]). In addition to 17 individual packages of cocaine, defendant possessed $639 in cash, including a large number of $1 bills.

The motion court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion without…