Laux v. Chopin Land Associates, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
The plaintiff-appellee (Chopin) has petitioned the court for rehearing asserting that we erroneously reported the date its action was commenced and erred in the proper interpretation of the Indiana Right-to-Farm Act, IC 84-1-52-4.
We grant rehearing and vacate the former opinion in this case.
The record discloses that in June 1986 Lauxes listed for sale with a local real estate dealer approximately 118 of the 128 acres they owned and farmed in Whitley County, Indiana. They intended to retain the remaining ten acres which surrounded their home.
In late July or early August Lauxes'…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re the Marrage of MilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Erbrich Products Co., Inc. v. WillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Wendt v. KerkhofIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Laux v. Chopin Land Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Toskos v. SwankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Parker v. Obert's Legacy Dairy, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.