Legal Opinion

Bechtel Corp. v. Winther

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 31, 1977No. 77-209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission found that appellee’s claim was compensable under the “special hazards” exception to the “going and coming” rule and awarded death benefits to her as a widow. Appellants contend that the Commission erred, as a matter of law, in so finding and, therefore, the circuit court’s judgment affirming the Commission should be reversed. We do not agree since there is substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding.

The essential facts are not in dispute. The appellee’s decedent was an employee of appellant Bechtel Corp. on January 15,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Frank Lyon Co. v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Burks, Inc. v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sokolowski v. Best Western Golden Lion HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stepney v. INGALLS SHIPBUILDING DIV., ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API