Legal Opinion

State v. LeFaber

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1996No. 63090-9PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDollxver, J.

— Defendant Victor A. LeFaber challenges a trial court instruction as erroneously requiring that the jury find actual danger of imminent harm to accept his claim of self-defense. The court agrees the jury instruction failed to make manifestly clear the law of self-defense and thereby prevented Defendant from obtaining a fair trial. We reverse Defendant’s conviction.

On the night of December 11, 1989, Defendant shot and killed Evan Stephens. See State v. LeFaber, 77 Wn. App. 766, 767-68, 893 P.2d 1140 (1995). Charged with second degree murder, Defendant argued self-defense, asserting Stephens’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. TheroffWashington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KylloWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MomahWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API