Legal Opinion

Crowley

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 10, 2002No. 99-P-1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

We consider in this appeal whether a prison inmate who has failed to seek review by certiorari of asserted deficiencies in a disciplinary proceeding that results in forfeited good time credits can seek habeas corpus to the same end years later. We conclude that in such circumstances an inmate may not use habeas corpus as a substitute for certiorari, and we affirm the dismissal of the inmate’s habeas corpus petition.

Background. The essential facts are not in dispute. Jeffrey Crowley received a sentence of twenty-two and one-half to twenty-five years for armed robbery, effective April 8, 1987.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Nelson v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Pina v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goetzendanner v. SuperintendentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  2. EDWARD PIERCEMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
  3. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  4. Stevens v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API