Legal Opinion
Carmel & Carmel PC v. Dellis Construction, Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 1, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0158PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
On December 2, 2011, the Court granted Carmel & Carmel PC’s (“Carmel”) motion to dismiss Clarity Ltd.’s (“Clarity”) counterclaims, finding no basis for Clarity’s conversion claim and determining that Carmel did not exhibit willful default or gross negligence in failing to distribute the escrowed funds to Clarity prior to filing this interpleader. Memo. Op. [Dkt. # 38]. Carmel now moves for $123,085.47 in attorney’s fees and costs under the Escrow Agreement’s indemnification provision. Clarity, however, claims that it is not responsible for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. CofieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. KnightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Associates, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012