Legal Opinion

McCurry v. Keith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 1994No. 2114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Connor, Judge:

Jane Davenport McCurry sued the Keiths to recover over $8,000 she lost playing video poker machines at their business. She alleged fifteen separate incidents. The trial judge granted the Keiths’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and McCurry appeals. We reverse and remand.

The court held the facts McCurry alleged showed: (1) the money she lost was for the use of the machine; (2) the poker machines were not illegal and, therefore, not in violation of the statute; and (3) the Keiths were not “so playing” the game under the statute.

According to the complaint, the Keiths operate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. McCurry v. KeithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Montjoy v. One Stop of Abbeville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Montjoy v. One Stop of Abbeville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API