Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of Lakewood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDowd, J.
Three issues must be determined by this court. First, does the Freedom substation fall within the definition of *376“public utility facility” contained in R. C. 4905.65(A)(2). If the answer is in the affirmative, then, second, does Freedom meet the three tests contained in R. C. 4905.65(B). If it does, then we must determine how much, if any, regulation is permitted the city by the last paragraph of R. C. 4905.65(B).
The appellee, CEI, argues that the first issue should not be considered by this court, as it was not raised by the appellant in the courts below. The appellant contends, with much…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of PainesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. JulianoOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. ScapellOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Village of MayfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1977