Legal Opinion
Griffy's Landscape Maintenance LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 17, 2001No. 01-309CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Griffy’s Landscape Maintenance, LLC, (“Griffy”) has invoked the bid protest jurisdiction of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), to mount a variety of legal challenges to the United States Department of the Army’s (“Army”) procurement of tree trimming and right of way maintenance services at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.
This contract has been extremely contentious. From the time of its inception it has been the subject of nine bid protests. On a previous occasion we reviewed the procurement when Griffy brought a post-award bid protest challenging…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Briscoe v. LahueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- American Fed. of Govt. Employees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Baird Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Tigerswan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Data Monitor Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Davis/HRGM Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.