Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 19, 1984No. 83 C 4110PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action are or have been applicants for or recipients of disability benefits under Title II and/or Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). They have been denied benefits on the ground that their disabilities are not severe enough to prevent them from working. They challenge the validity of the applicable regulations, 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(c), 416.920(c), 404.1522, 416.922 (1983) and Social Security Ruling (“SSR”) 82-55 (cum. ed. 1982), as violative of the Act and the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Paul E. Dumas v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edna Johnson v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Bohn v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Samuels v. HecklerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.