Legal Opinion

Blair v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 8, 2002No. A-7853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Donald Blair was tried in the Dillingham district court for fourth-degree assault upon his wife. Soon after the jury retired to begin its deliberations, Blair's attorney told the trial judge that he wished to be present for any playbacks of testimony that the jury might request.

At 4:10 that afternoon, Blair's attorney telephoned the court to inform the judge that he would be away from his office for approximately forty-five minutes, picking up his wife and grandchildren. Seventeen minutes later, at 4:27 p.m., the jury requested a playback of a hotly disputed portion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Isaac James Tindle, A/K/A I.J.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. John v. CapozziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Dixon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sipary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
  2. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  3. Cogdill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API