Legal Opinion

Cogdill v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 19, 2004No. A-8541Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Jerry Dwight Cogdill appeals his convietion for bootlegging-selling aleoholic beverages without a license-in a "local option" *633community (4.e., a community that has voted to restrict the sale and/or possession of alcoholic beverages under AS 0411491).1 Cog-dill claims that the superior court was obliged to dismiss the prosecution pursuant to Criminal Rule 48(c) because the district attorney's office refused to grant immunity to a potential witness who asserted her privilege against self-incrimination and declined to testify.

For the reasons explained here, we conclude…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  2. State v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  3. Blair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API