Legal Opinion
Jankovic v. International Crisis Group
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 1, 2006No. CIVA104CV01198RBWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs bring this action alleging that the defendants committed defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and tortious interference with business expectancy, by publishing knowingly false statements in the form of three separate documents. First Amended Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 80-119. International Crisis Group (“Crisis Group”), one of the defendants, has filed a motion to dismiss or alternately to strike portions of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(f). International Crisis Group’s Motion to Dismiss…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- The Honorable Bob Barr v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jankovic v. International Crisis GroupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Adelson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Jankovic v. International Crisis GroupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Sensormatic Security Corporation v. Sensormatic Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Jankovic v. International Crisis GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.