Legal Opinion

State v. Carcieri

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 18, 1999No. 98-209-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Justice.

The case comes before us pursuant to a certified question relative to the interpretation of G.L.1956 § 12-7-20, which provides that an arrestee must be afforded an opportunity to make a confidential telephone call as soon as practical after his arrest. Following a pre-trial conference relative to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint charging him with driving under the influence (DUI) in violation of G.L.1956 § 31-27-2, a judge of the District Court determined that the questions raised during the hearing were of considerable doubt and importance, and that she…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Becker v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. Bickler v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gilbane Co. v. PoulasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chavers v. Fleet Bank (RI), N.A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  3. Advanced Fluid Systems Inc v. Kevin HuberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. In Re Christopher S.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. State v. VeltriSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API