Taylor v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
On appeal from a child support order, “[a]bsent a clear abuse of discretion, a judge’s determination of what is a proper amount of support will not be disturbed on appeal.” Plott v. Plott, 313 N.C. 63, 69, 326 S.E.2d 863, 868 (1985). To disturb the trial court’s calculation of appropriate child support, an appellant must establish that the trial judge’s ruling is “ ‘manifestly unsupported by reason.’ ” Id., quoting Clark v. Clark, 301 N.C. 123, 128-29, 271 S.E.2d 58, 63 (1980).
The significant issue in this appeal is whether the trial judge may award interest on an award of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Bromhal v. StottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Appelbe v. AppelbeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Guilford County ex rel. Norwood v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006