Legal Opinion

Lavalle v. Soucy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District; the Hon. Tazewell B. Tanner, presiding Justice, and Hon. James C. Allen and Hon. David J. Baker, Justices;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of '• St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Dickey

This is a petition for mandamus, filed in the circuit court of St. Clair county, by Soucy, stating that he was elected supervisor of the village of Cahokia Commons, and qualified as such, and at the time of his election, and for several years prior thereto, Lavalle had held that office, and as such officer had “possession and control of all the books, papers and moneys of said Commons,” and that, notwithstanding the expiration of his term, and the fact that he was no longer entitled to the possession of such books, papers and moneys, Lavalle refused and still refuses to deliver the same to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. GlannIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stott v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Fowler v. FinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Lynch v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Puckett v. State ex rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  5. Women's Catholic Order of Foresters v. CondonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API