Legal Opinion

Maraman v. City of Carmel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2015No. 29A05-1504-OV-145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

:MAY, Judge.

Jason Maraman challenges his citation’ for speeding. As the Carmel city ordinance under which Maraman was ticketed was void, the trial court should have granted Maraman’s motion to dismiss. We must accordingly reverse.1

Facts and Procedural History

Maraman was stopped for speeding in Carmel. The complaint and summons issued to Maraman indicated he was driving 30 miles per hour when the speed limit was 20,2 “[cjontrary to the form of the ... Local Ordinance in such case made and *1220provided. L.O. No. 8-2.”3 (Appellant’s App. at 10.) The Carmel City Court entered judgment against him and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Mitsch v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Daniels v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Town of RoselandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawrence Lennon v. City of Carmel, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Knox County Association for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. Melissa (Cope) DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Jason Maraman v. City of Carmel, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Judy Lammons v. EDCO Environmental Services, IncIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API