Legal Opinion

Marino v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Defendant, the United States of America, moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action.

The action was brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act 1 . and the parties have stipulated as to the facts.

On December 21, 1946, plaintiffs Sylvio Marino and his wife Vivian Marino were riding in an automobile owned by plaintiff Manuel Peno. The car became involved in a collision with a United States Coast Guard jeep, as a result of which both personal and property damage were alleged to have been sustained by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. McMichael v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donald W. Powers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Reardon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  4. Menclewicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1953
  5. Connor v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API