Legal Opinion

Theall v. Sam Carline, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided February 28, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 8476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Complainant, Dudley J. Theall, brings this suit on the law side of the Court under the provisions of Title 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 (Jones Act), and the general maritime law, for indemnity for injuries allegedly received by him while employed aboard a tugboat owned by the defendant, Sam Carline, Inc., on which he was employed as a cook. In addition to indemnity, complainant seeks maintenance- and cure.

The case was tried to the Court without a jury, and we make the following findings of fact:

I

On or about May 5, 1961, complainant was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morel v. Sabine Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
  2. Rufolo ex rel. Rossiello v. Midwest Marine Contractor, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. TCW Special Credits v. F/V Kassandra Z, Official No. 553390High Court of American Samoa · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API