Legal Opinion

Callwave Communications, LLC v. AT & T Mobility, LCC

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 15, 2016No. Civil Action No. 12-1701-RGA, Civil Action No. 12-1704-RGA, Civil Action No. 12-1788-RGAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

Presently before the Court in these related cases are the Defendants’ renewed motions for judgment on the pleadings that the asserted claims of the ’970 patent are invalid under § 101. (C.A. No. 12-1701-RGA, D.I. 439; C.A. No. 12-1704-RGA, D.I. 419; CA. No. 12-1788-RGA, D.I. 249).1 The motions have been fully briefed. (D.I. 440, 452, 462). The Court held oral argument on March 16, 2016. (D.I. 532). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendants’ § 101 motions.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed this patent infringement lawsuit…

2Cases cited22 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Imaginear, Inc., et al. v. Niantic, Inc. d/b/a Niantic LabsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
Schoeneckers, Inc. d/b/a BI Worldwide v. Kobie Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2026