Legal Opinion

Imaginear, Inc., et al. v. Niantic, Inc. d/b/a Niantic Labs

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 7, 2026No. 1:24-cv-01252Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IMAGINEAR, INC., et al., , Case No. 1:24-cv-01252-JDW v. NIANTIC, INC. d/b/a NIANTIC LABS, MEMORANDUM Prepare for trouble, make it double. For a second time, Niantic, Inc. has demonstrated that ImagineAR, Inc. and Imagine AR, Inc.’s patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §101. Thus, I will grant Niantic’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. I. BACKGROUND ImagineAR, Inc. and Imagine AR, Inc. (together “IAR”) are the respective owner and licensee of various patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 10,946,284, entitled “Systems And…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  3. Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API