Legal Opinion

Seggerman Bros. v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The defendant sought to dismiss the complaint in this action because it asserted that the causes of action set forth therein were improperly united. The specified ground of their improper joinder i that they are inconsistent.

There are two causes of action pleaded, both founded upon the same facts.

The first cause of action alleges a shipment of 1,770 boxes of evaporated apples forwarded by the defendant to the plaintiff. The apples were covered by a railroad bill of lading to defendant’s order, indorsed in blank. When the bill of lading was presented to *8the plaintiff, the defendant received on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Joannes Brothers Co. v. . LambornNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelso v. CavanaghNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Anness v. Seaboard Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Neuss, Hesslein & Co. v. MeadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API