Legal Opinion
Simmang v. Texas Board of Law Examiners
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided September 15, 2004No. 1:03-cv-00650PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
YEAKEL, District Judge.
Before the Court are the following: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and Defendants’ supplement to the motion, -which are primarily based on sovereign immunity grounds (Clerk’s Document Nos. 1 and 3); Magistrate Judge Andrew Austin’s Report and Recommendation regarding the motion and the supplement (Clerk’s Document No. 25); Defendants’ Objections To Magistrate’s Report ' and Recommendation (Clerk’s Document No. 26); and Plaintiff James Simmang’s response to Defendants’ objections (Clerk’s Document No.…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ace American Insurance v. Huntsman Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Rodriguez Velazquez v. Autoridad Metropolitana De AutobusesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Alford v. PaxtonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Locke v. Texas Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022
- Mark Verstuyft, Robin Verstuyft, Gordon Kuenemann, Wendy Kuenemann, Earl Beyer, Kenneth Beyer v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo National Bank WestDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.