Legal Opinion · Dissent

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Scroggs

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 16, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 16, September Term, 2004Published

1DissentRaker, J.

The sanction in this case should be disbarment. I would not tack on a requirement that before respondent may apply for readmission to the Maryland Bar, he must first be readmitted to the Oklahoma Bar.

I recognize that this disciplinary action arises as a reciprocal disciplinary action. Respondent’s resignation was accepted in Oklahoma, his name was stricken from the Roll of Attorneys, and the state Supreme Court ordered that five years must elapse before he may make application for readmission to that Bar. Oklahoma treats resignation while disciplinary matters are pending as disbarment.

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re MeyersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. In Re the Petition for Reinstatement to Practice Law of BravermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API