Legal Opinion
Conti v. Morgenthau
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
These are separate applications by two petitioners, Ralph Conti and David Newman, to suppress evidence and for the return of property pursuant to Rule 41 (e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The applications will be treated together since, in large measure, they revolve about the same factual situation.
On January 22, 1964, Special Agents of the Internal Revenue Service obtained warrants, one to search Apartment B at 1582 First Avenue, New York City, and another to search an automobile belonging to one Ralph Conti. The warrant to search the apartment was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- United States v. Ralph Conti and David NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. Leon J. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.