Legal Opinion

City of Attica v. Mull Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 16, 1984No. 54,256PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

Appellant City of Attica, Kansas (plaintiff) appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of appellees Mull Drilling Company, Inc., et al. (defendants), in an action for damages based on nuisance and trespass.

Plaintiff s action was based upon the saltwater contamination of several water wells used by plaintiff as the source for its municipal water supply system. Such contamination allegedly occurred as a result of defendants’ drilling operations in the proximity of the wells.

The only issue in this case is what, if any, statute of limitations applies to plaintiff s action.

It is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. Herthel v. BarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Main v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  3. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. City Of Wichita, Kansas v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Hiji v. City of GarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API