Legal Opinion
Hiji v. City of Garnett
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 9, 1991No. 64887PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Holmes, J.;
This case arises from an inverse condemnation proceeding filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. Chief Judge Earl E. O’Connor has certified two questions to the Supreme Court of Kansas for resolution pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, K.S.A. 60-3201 et seq. The questions certified are:
“Is the three-year statute of limitations period, which is applicable to implied contract actions pursuant to K.S.A. 60-512, applicable to inverse condemnation actions under Kansas law? If not, what is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Kane v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Prendergast v. Northern Virginia Regional Park AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Sanders v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Mid-America Pipeline Co. v. Lario Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Schmidt v. Trademark, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- Dw Aina Le'a Development, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use CommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Lario Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.