Obertman v. Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIX OBERTMAN, No. 2:19-cv-02487-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ELECTROLUX HOME CARE PRODUCTS, INC. 15 Defendant. 16 17 In this putative class action over allegedly defective dehumidifiers, defendant 18 moves to dismiss several of plaintiff’s claims under Rule 12(b)(6). Mot., ECF No. 14. For the 19 reasons discussed below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion in part and DENIES it in part. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 This putative class action arises from one central claim: certain Frigidaire 22…