State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Cleo Patrick Davis, Jr. appeals from his convictions of trafficking in opium by transportation and trafficking in opium by possession. Defendant primarily contends on appeal that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof offered at trial. Defendant points out that the indictment alleged that he trafficked in opium, while the evidence showed that the substance was an opium derivative. Based on the plain language of the statute, we hold that no fatal variance occurred.
Facts
The State’s evidence tended to show the following facts. At about 3:00 p.m. on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. Ahmadi-TurshiziCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014