Legal Opinion

Shirley v. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 7, 2025No. 3:23-cv-05077Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 RUTHANNA SHIRLEY et al., CASE NO. 3:23-cv-05077-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS 12 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. NOS. 69, 75) 13 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 18 69, 75). For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 69) is 19 GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 75) is DENIED. 20 II…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API