Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 18, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge BROBSON.
In this appeal, Appellant Cozen O’Connor (Firm) contends that the Court of Common-Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) erred when it determined that the campaign finance provisions of Philadelphia Code Chapter 20-1000 • (Philadelphia Campaign Finance Law) limited the manner by which the Firm could forgive $448,468.09 in legal debt incurred by the Friends of Bob Brady (Committee) in defending a ballot challenge.to the candidacy of U.S. Congressman Bob Brady in the 2007 Philadelphia Democratic mayoral primary. The. Firm, also argues that, the trial court erred when…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Council of Middletown Township v. BenhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harmer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014