Legal Opinion
Mauro King v. Berryhill
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 14, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00285-WGYPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
YOUNG, D.J.1
I. INTRODUCTION
Charlene A, Mauro King (“King”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”)2 denying King’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits (“benefits”) for lack of disability.
A. Procedural History
On February 16, 2012, King filed an application for benefits, alleging disability since November 7, 2010. Admin. R. 171, ECF No. 9-6.3 King’s application was ini*441tially denied on May 21, 2012. Id. at 10. Thereafter, King filed a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Moran v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sinclair v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Silva v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Ihde v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
- Preston v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Smith v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.