Legal Opinion
Smith v. Berryhill
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 6, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-00799-WGYPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
YOUNG, D.J.1
I. INTRODUCTION
Ritchie Smith (“Smith”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking this Court’s review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”)2 denying Smith both disability insurance and Supplemental Security Income benefits (collectively, “benefits”). Compl. ¶ 1; ECF No. 1. Smith contends that the Commissioner’s decision applies incorrect legal standards and is not supported by substantial evidence. Id. ¶ 7. Specifically, Smith argues that the decision incorrectly concludes…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- McIntyre v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Malespin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023