Legal Opinion

4220 Broadway Associates v. Perez

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered December 22, 1999 affirmed, with $10 costs.

*603Civil Court properly vacated the final judgment and warrant in this nonpayment proceeding upon tenant’s tender of all outstanding arrears (see, Parkchester Apts. Co. v Scott, 271 AD2d 273). Landlord’s election to first apply tenant’s tender toward the nonpossessory judgment for attorneys’ fees, thereby creating a “shortfall” in the amount of tenant’s tender, does not dictate a contrary result. This course of action would effectively circumvent our holding in Silber v Schwartzman (150 Misc 2d 1) that attorneys’ fees…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkchester Apartments Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. C. Silber v. SchwartzmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Related Tiffany v. FaustAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
  2. Rip Van Winkle House, LLC v. BarteePoughkeepsie City Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API