Horel v. Horel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Upon this appeal the plaintiff attacks only that part of the judgment which provides for the division of property and the amount of support money and alimony that he is ordered to pay by the judgment, claiming each is excessive.
The plaintiff, a veterinarian, and his wife moved to Stevens Point in 1938. In 1940 the parties purchased a home in said city, at 1242 Church street. Later the plaintiff built a small animal hospital upon the rear of the lot upon which the home is located. Record title to said real estate was in the name of both parties as joint tenants. The home was occupied by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Littig v. LittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Voegeli v. VoegeliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Quigley v. QuigleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- Balaam v. BalaamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Parsons v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Wilberscheid v. WilberscheidWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. JordanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Brackob v. BrackobWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.