Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Quigley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, J.

The contest is on the division of the property of the parties. The trial court recognized that its disposition of the case was somewhat unusual. The 'court said:

“But it is made because of circumstances which are seldom found in this sort of litigation. If it is without precedent, I think it is-safe to say that precedent for a similar situation is not to be found. Here the husband is allowed less than is ordinarily given him; but I do it because I am satisfied that it is all that can be provided for him and for the further reason that I have the best reason for believing that whatever he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Steinbach v. SteinbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Voegeli v. VoegeliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Horel v. HorelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Burg v. BurgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Burg v. BurgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API