Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Emmett v. Cruickshank

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

— The parties to this action were the owners of adjacent lots in the town of Emmett. In May, 1920, they entered into a written agreement to build a party-wall on the dividing line between their respective properties, one-half of the wall to be on the property of each. The more material parts of said agreement read:

“The said first party in consideration of the covenants and agreements on the part of the second parties hereinafter contained, agree to at once commence the work of excavating for the construction of, the foundation for such party-wall, and at its present, own cost, charge and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Fritcher v. KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Fritcher v. KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Neil v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Miller v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Patrick v. BisbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Koser v. Bohemian Breweries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Brooks v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Eastwood v. SchultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API