United States v. Ramos
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM D. BROWNING, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the government’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s previous ruling granting Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. For the following reasons, the Court will deny the government’s Motion.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the question of whether the search of Defendant’s vehicle, yielding two weapons, cocaine, and marijuana obtained from a closed backpack in the front seat of his car, was lawful. The government seeks to justify the search on the basis of a lawful arrest for the misdemeanor traffic offense of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
- McCluskey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Hiveley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Anthony M. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- United States v. Anthony M. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994