Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 12, 1993No. CR 92-648-TUC-WDBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM D. BROWNING, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is the government’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s previous ruling granting Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. For the following reasons, the Court will deny the government’s Motion.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the question of whether the search of Defendant’s vehicle, yielding two weapons, cocaine, and marijuana obtained from a closed backpack in the front seat of his car, was lawful. The government seeks to justify the search on the basis of a lawful arrest for the misdemeanor traffic offense of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. McCluskey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hiveley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony M. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. United States v. Anthony M. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API