Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Great American Assurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 29, 2007No. 05-06-01028-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice LANG-MIERS.

This is a breach of contract case arising from an insurance coverage dispute. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurance carrier. We affirm.

In March 2004, Appellants Craig Harrison, Gwen Harrison, Randall Reed, and Marcel M. Weiner purchased a two-year-old thoroughbred filly named Oma and insured her as a racehorse through Appel-lee Great American Assurance Company. Appellants placed Oma in the care of a licensed racehorse trainer to begin her training. In May, Oma underwent surgery to remove a bone spur in her knee. She was taken…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nautilus Insurance Co. v. Steinberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy Number 509/QF037603 v. LM Ericsson Telefon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Melvin West v. Southern County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API