Legal Opinion
Hasmik Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2024No. 21-56237PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Nos. 21-56237 Individually and as Guardian as Litem 22-55168 for NEC, a Minor; MARIANA MANUKYAN, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09302- Plaintiffs-Appellants, MCS-E v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ORDER ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; MICHEL MOORE, Chief of Police; ROMERO GONZALEZ, Officer; FRED CUETO, Sergeant; RODRIGO SORIA, Officer; AIRAM POTTER, Officer; BRITTANY OKE, Officer; JEFF RODD, Officer; DANIEL MARTINEZ, Officer; DANIEL GAYTON, Officer; EDUARDO PICHE, Officer; MARIO MENSES, Officer; BRITTANY PRIMO, Officer,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Albert Tito PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ellis v. United States District Court for the Western District of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradley Bieganski v. David Shinn, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026